That's Amusement ... Legal Style

Issue 3 (March 2005) of Sweet & Maxwell's Entertainment Law Review has at in 1 trial emerged. It's nonetheless real sparse -- the IPKat hopes it's non going downwardly amongst a dreadful illness -- merely there's to a greater extent than or less practiced in addition to readable textile inward it. This includes:

* Paris-based Hogan & Hartson lawyers Winston J. Maxwell in addition to Julie Massaloux squad upwardly amongst their Budapest colleague Aurel Pinter to clitoris the electrical flow revenue enhancement incentives for making displace pictures inward French Republic in addition to Hungary;

* David Engel (Addleshaw Goddard, London) reviews the United Kingdom of Great Britain in addition to Northern Ireland of Britain in addition to Northern Republic of Ireland Film Council's Film Theft inward the UK in addition to looks at the opportunities provided past times the novel technologies too every bit their inevitable threats;

* Veteran IP commentator Peter Groves (Bircham Dyson Bell) adds his thoughts on the recent Court of Appeal determination inward Griggs v Evans - the "Doc Martens logo" example - relating to copyright inward commissioned logos. Not specifically an amusement constabulary issue, merely neither is it just irrelevant to that field.

Click here for your re-create of Film Theft inward the UK
More peachy cinema thefts here and here