Convenience Non The Same Equally Justice?

here) too was sure enough that the appeal would live on dismissed, but their Lordships stimulate got gone too allowed it.

The claimants were Sportswear, who marketed STONE ISLAND clothing, too its United Kingdom of Great Britain too Northern Ireland distributor. They entered into 2 agreements, the object of which was to accomplish a clear geographical separation inward the marketing of STONE ISLAND garments. By those agreements the distributor had exclusivity inside its territory too agreed non to sell into other territories.

Below: around other controversial Stone Island - Rockall, claimed both past times Republic of Ireland too the UK

Stonestyle obtained too sold STONE ISLAND garments from a source other than the United Kingdom of Great Britain too Northern Ireland distributor. Since the clothe had codes from which Sportswear could seat the client to whom they were originally sold, those labels had been removed. There was no dispute that the vesture was genuine too that it had been placed on the marketplace seat inward the European Economic Area (EEA) past times Sportswear or amongst its consent.

Sportswear sued Stonestyle for merchandise score infringement. Stonestyle argued that the distribution agreements infringed Article 81 of the EC Treaty (distortion or prevention of competition) too that the codes inward the garment labels were for the purposes of enabling Sportswear to constabulary too enforce the absolute territorial exclusivity conferred past times the agreements betwixt them. It was accepted that, for a breach of Article 81 to live on relevant, at that spot had to live on a sufficient nexus betwixt the alleged merchandise score infringement too that breach. Sportswear applied to bang out sure enough paragraphs of the defense forcefulness relating to those allegations. Warren J allowed that application on the footing that at that spot was no adequate nexus betwixt the agreements too the number of whether Sportswear had legitimate reasons to oppose farther distribution of the garments nether department 12(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1994.


Right: the master copy Euro-defence? the Maginot line

The Court of Appeal allowed Stonestyle's appeal.

* It was arguable that, if Stonestyle could evidence that a relevant understanding was inward breach of Article 81, it had a stronger footing for proverb that Sportswear did non stimulate got legitimate reasons to oppose farther dealings inward the goods.

* Having regard to, inter alia, recent references to the European Court of Justice relating to the number of parallel imports too re-labelling, sure enough issues of European Community law arising inward relation to those matters remained unresolved. Warren J should non thus stimulate got been satisfied that the defense forcefulness was necessarily jump to fail.

* The paragraphs of the defense forcefulness struck out were non unarguable for lack of a legally sufficient nexus. Whether such nexus equally was proved at trial would live on held to live on sufficient inward law too inward fact was a affair for the trial judge.

remains convinced that, inward sectors such equally the vesture industry, where at that spot are tens of thousands of players, products are almost infinitely substitutable too no-one has a dominant marketplace seat share, agreements such equally those which Sportswear entered into amongst its United Kingdom of Great Britain too Northern Ireland distributor are hardly going to pick out the globe to an end: if yous await at consumer selection too how much the cost of vesture has fallen inward the European Union inward the past times 2 decades, it's hard non to believe that agreements similar this are necessary for sthe survival of pocket-size players. Merpel agrees, adding that Articles 81 too 82 are then slow to raise, too then spurious, that they are almost ever going to live on an expensive smokescreen that a rights possessor has to penetrate earlier he tin pick out his case. Having said all this, neither the IPKat nor Merpel are convinced that there's then much incorrect amongst cutting off labels too erasing bar-codes, then long equally (i) the exercise doesn't demeanor upon the essential role of the merchandise score of guaranteeing the identity of the source of the goods too (ii) consumers don't mind.

It's worth quoting the succinct concurring judgment of Lord Justice Longmore, amongst around emphases added:

"It is a well-known too rather disturbing fact that it costs far to a greater extent than to resolve intellectual holding disputes inward England than inward other parts of the EEA. This instance is a proficient example. The parties stimulate got elected to pass considerable sums of coin inward making detailed submissions nearly iii paragraphs of a pleading, earlier whatsoever trial of what may live on called the merits of the dispute volition pick out place. I concord amongst Lloyd LJ that ... this appeal must live on allowed. That way that the engagement currently fixed for a iii hateful solar daytime trial volition stimulate got to live on vacated; this volition inevitably motility farther delay too farther expense. That is regrettable but follows from our procedural dominion that a defence, which is arguable, should non live on struck out earlier trial.

Undoubtedly it would live on convenient if it were possible to handgrip that the Article 81 number could exclusively live on used equally a sword rather than a shield so that contest issues could non live on used to soiled the waters of (here) a comparatively straightforward merchandise score dispute. But convenience is non ever the same equally justice too I stimulate got been, a niggling reluctantly, persuaded ... that it is arguable that European Community law does non invariably permit merchandise score issues too anti-competition issues to live on compartmentalised too separated from 1 another. It may plow out at trial that the accused volition live on able to rely on department 12(2) of the Trade Marks Act 1994 to defeat the claimant's claim but, ..., it is non possible to live on sure enough that the defendant's seat volition non live on stronger if it tin besides flora a breach of Article 81. That is something which, inward my view, the European instance law, at whatsoever charge per unit of measurement arguably, entitles the accused to do".