Referees Wanted; Halt Of The Affaire

here) in addition to getting this answer from Wolfgang Schramek:

"Article 7(1)(b) CTMR (marks are initially unregistrable if devoid of distinctive character) was non at effect because the applicant had non refuted the examiner’s analisis, which was therefore confirmed.

Article 7(3) CTMR (marks are registrable, later all, if they accept acquired distinctiveness through use) had been invoked yesteryear the applicant earlier the Board of Appeal in addition to the CFI. The documents submitted were, however, insufficient to demonstrate acquired distinctiveness through use. The CFI underlined that Article 7(3) had been applied correctly yesteryear the examiner in addition to the Board of Appeal, in addition to that the right to move heard in addition to the right to a legitimate defense had non been violated inward the introduce case".

Many thanks, Wolfgang. longs for the twenty-four hr menses that all European courtroom judgments in addition to purpose decisions are made available inward minority languages similar English linguistic communication (!). Till then, it's proficient to know that in that place are unopen to Community-minded people who tin move proceed us all informed. Merpel says, unopen to of the English-language decisions postulate translating into English linguistic communication too.