draws his readers' attending to to a greater extent than or less bank-holiday reading. In Class International v Unilever, Advocate General Jacobs has discussed the merchandise reach seat of goods which are inwards transit from i non-EU nation to to a greater extent than or less other only which locomote via the EU.
- Trade reach owners can't oppose the entry into the European Union of non-EU goods bearing their merchandise marks on the grounds that such entry would industrial plant life hold upwards of their merchandise marks nether Art.5(1) of the TM Directive.
- For every bit long every bit such goods rest non-Community goods, offering them for sale or selling them volition non industrial plant life ‘using [the mark] inwards the class of trade’ inside the pregnant of Article 5(1) of the TM Directive.
- The merchandise reach possessor can, nether Article 5(1) of Directive 89/104, forestall their unloosen into gratuitous circulation inwards the European Economic Area.
- In merchandise reach infringement proceedings, the burden of proof is a thing for national police except amongst consider to the query whether the goods were lay on the marketplace inwards the European Economic Area nether that merchandise reach amongst the proprietor’s consent.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar